Case LawHigh Court › Mrs.tulsi Rajkumar v. The Assistant Comm...

Mrs.tulsi Rajkumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range Ii,Coimbatore

High Court 23 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mrs.tulsi Rajkumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range Ii,Coimbatore
Date of order
23 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
2004-2005
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Mrs.tulsi Rajkumar v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range Ii,Coimbatore, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The Tax Case Appeals are, accordingly, allowed to bewithdrawn and they are dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.11.2018 CORAMTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH Tax Case (Appeal) No.425 and 426 of 2009 Mrs.Tulsi Rajkumar.. Appellant in TCA 425/2009Mr.V.Rajkumar.. Appellant in TCA 426/2009 Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Range II,Coimbatore. .. Respondent in TCA 425/2009The Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Company Circle IV(I)Coimbatore. .. Respondent in TCA 426/2009 Tax Case Appeal filed under Sec. 260A of the Income Tax Act,1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Madras 'A' Bench, Chennai, dated 24.10.2008 in ITANos.855/MDS/2007 and 1217/MDS/2007. Against the proceedings of the commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-I, Coimbatore in I.T.A.No.287/2006-07 dated 02.04.2007and I.T.A.No.264/2006-07 dated 20.02.2007 against the order ofthe Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Range-II, Coimbatore(I/C) dated 23.11.2006 for the Assessment Year 2004-2005 and theAssessment year 2004-2005 dated 21.12.2006. For Appellants : Mr.J.Balachander For Respondents : Mr.T.R.Senthilkumar, Senior Standing Counsel https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ COMMON JUDGMENT (Judgment of the court was delivered by DR.VINEET KOTHARI,J.) Learned counsel appearing for the appellants/assessees seeksleave of the court to withdraw the Tax Case Appeals as theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal has subsequently, in aMiscellaneous Petition, remanded the matter to the assessingofficer. 2. The learned counsel for the appellants has also made anendorsement to that effect. 3. The Tax Case Appeals are, accordingly, allowed to bewithdrawn and they are dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant RegistrarsskTo1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Madras A Bench, Chennai.2. The Additional commissioner of Income Tax Range -II, Coimbatore. (I/C)+1 cc to M/s.T.R.Senthilkumar, Advocate Sr.No.29909+1 cc to Mr.S.Sridhar, Advocate Sr.No.80566 RK(CO)CSL/02.01.2019 T.C.A.No.425 & 426 of 2009
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan