Mrs.vidya Reddy v. The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward 1(2)
High Court
29 Mar 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Mrs.vidya Reddy v. The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward 1(2)
Date of order
29 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Mrs.vidya Reddy v. The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward 1(2), the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Issue: Whether the Tribunal was right inholding that the amount of Rs.45,79,550/- isnot exempt under Sec 10(38) of the Income TaxAct, 1961?
Decision: The tax case appeal stands disposed of with theaforementioned liberty and consequently, the substantialquestions of law framed are left open.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 29.03.2021
CORAM :
The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAMandThe Honourable Ms.Justice R.N.MANJULA
Tax Case Appeal No.827 of 2018
Mrs.Vidya Reddy,Represented by Power of Attorneyholder, Mr.V.K.Jhaver,18/19/Bawa Road,Alwarpet, Chennai - 600 018.
...AppellantVs
The Income Tax Officer,International Taxation Ward 1(2),121, Uttmar Gandhi Road,Nungambakkam,Chennai - 600 006....Respondent
APPEAL under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 againstthe order dated 15.05.2018 made in ITA.No.2016/Chny/2017 on thefile of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench forthe assessment year 2014-15 and Appeal against the order dated05/06/2017 made in PAN No. on the file of the ITANos.105/CIT (A)-16/14-15 and against the order dated 28/12/2016ITO(International Taxation)-ward 1(2)chennai for the assessmentyear 2014-15.
JUDGMENT(Delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam,J)This appeal has been filed by the assessee under Section260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('the Act' for brevity)challengingtheorderdated15.05.2018madeinITA.No.2016/Chny/2017 on the file of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Chennai 'D' Bench ('the Tribunal' for brevity) for theassessment year 2014-15.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. The appeal was admitted on 23.11.2019 on the followingsubstantial questions of law:
"1. Whether the Tribunal was right inholding that the amount of Rs.45,79,550/- isnot exempt under Sec 10(38) of the Income TaxAct, 1961?
2. Whether the Tribunal erred on holdingthat the provisions of Sec 68 are attractedin the instant case when the assessee hasfully discharged the onus of proof?
3. Whether the Tribunal is not correctin not adhering to the judicial discipline byignoring orders of the Co-ordinate Benches ofKolkata benches and also the Madras bencheswhere the identical transaction has beenaccepted and in some cases remanded back totheassessingofficerforfurtherinvestigation?
4. Whether the Tribunal was right in notexercising its discretion to restore thematter to the files of the lower authoritiesto give opportunity of being heard in respectof the material gathered behind the back ofthe assessee which have no live nexus orcasual connection with the appellant?"
3. We have heard Mr.V.S.Jayakumar, learned counsel for theappellant-assessee and Mr.R.Karthik Ranganathan, learned SeniorStanding Counsel appearing for the respondent-Revenue.
4. The learned counsel for the appellant-assessee submitsthat the assessee has already filed the declaration/undertakingunder the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and is awaiting orders to bepassed in Form No.3.
5. In the light of the subsequent event, the CompetentAuthority shall process the application/declaration inaccordance with the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 (Act 3of 2020) and pass appropriate orders as expeditiously aspossible. The assessee is given liberty to restore this appealin the event the ultimate decision to be taken on thedeclaration filed by the assessee under Section 4 of the saidAct is not in favour of the assessee. If such a prayer is made,the Registry shall entertain the prayer without insisting uponany application to be filed for condonation of delay inrestoration of the appeal and on such request made by theassessee by filing a miscellaneous petition for restoration, theRegistry shall place such petition before the appropriateDivision Bench for orders.
6. The tax case appeal stands disposed of with theaforementioned liberty and consequently, the substantialquestions of law framed are left open. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar
/TRUE COPY/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
hvk
To1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-16, Chennai.
3. The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward 1(2), 121, Uttmar Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006.
+1cc to Mr.VS.JAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE, SR.NO. 20508
6. The tax case appeal stands disposed of with theaforementioned liberty and consequently, the substantialquestions of law framed are left open. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar
/TRUE COPY/
Sub-Assistant Registrar
hvk
To1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'D' Bench, Chennai.
2. The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)-16, Chennai.
3. The Income Tax Officer, International Taxation Ward 1(2), 121, Uttmar Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai - 600 006.
+1cc to Mr.VS.JAYAKUMAR, ADVOCATE, SR.NO. 20508
TCA.No.827 of 2018AJB(CO)KKN 30.04.2021
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.