M/S Admac Formulations v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula
High Court
16 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Admac Formulations v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula
Date of order
16 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Admac Formulations v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
RA-CR-33-2019 in ITA-332-2015 (O&M)Date of Decision : 16.08.2019
M/s Admac Formulations
..... Applicant
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula
...... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AJAY TEWARTHON'BLE MR.JIUSTICAVNEESH JHINGAN
000
Present :Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate withMr. Manpreet Singh Kanda, Advocate
for the applicant-appellant.
Mr. Yogesh Putney, Advocate and|Mr. Ajiteshwar Singh, Advocatefor the Revenue.
000
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
For orders see RA-CR-26 of 2019 in ITA-214 of 2016,M/s Admac Formulations Vs. Commissioner of Income tax, Panchkuladecided vide order of even date.
(AJAY TEWARIT)JUDGE
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE
16.08.2019.pooja sharma-l
&Whether speaking/reasoned&Whether reportable
Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue