M/S. Adorable Commerce Pvt Ltd And Anr v. Income Tax Officer And Ors
High Court
19 Jan 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
M/S. Adorable Commerce Pvt Ltd And Anr v. Income Tax Officer And Ors
Date of order
19 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S. Adorable Commerce Pvt Ltd And Anr v. Income Tax Officer And Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTAConstitutional Writ JurisdictionOriginal Side
Present :- Hon’ble Mr. Justice Md. Nizamuddin
W.P.O. No. 1768 of 2021
M/S. ADORABLE COMMERCE PVT LTD AND ANRVs.INCOME TAX OFFICER AND ORS.
With
W.P.O. No. 1771 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1772 of 2021, W.P.O.No. 1774 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1777 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1779of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1780 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1781 of 2021,W.P.O. No. 1784 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1786 of 2021, W.P.O.No. 1787 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1791 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1793of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1794 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1796 of 2021,W.P.O. No. 1797 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1798 of 2021, W.P.O.No. 1799 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1800 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1801of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1802 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1803 of 2021,W.P.O. No. 1804 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1806 of 2021, W.P.O.No. 1807 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1809 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1811of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1812 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1813 of 2021,W.P.O. No. 1814 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1815 of 2021, W.P.O.No. 1817 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1818 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1819of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1821 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1822 of 2021,W.P.O. No. 1823 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1827 of 2021, W.P.O.No. 1830 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1831 of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1835of 2021, W.P.O. No. 1836 of 2021
For the Petitioners
:-
Mr. Subash Agarwal, Mr. Brijesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Avijit Dey, Mr. RohinJain, Mr. Aniket D. Agarwal, Mr. Sakshan Singhal, Mr. Anirudhya Dutta,Ms. Sapna Das, Mr. Siddhartha Das, Mrs. Vijaya Bhatia, Mr. Ganesh PrasadShaw, Mr. Taraknath Jaiswal, Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Mr. Pradeep Jewrajka,Ms. Pooja Jewrajka, Mr. Manas Kumar Paul, Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee, Mr.Biswaroop Mukherjee, Mr. Soumyajit Mishra, Mr. Pratyush Jhunjhunwala,Mr. Samit Rudra, Advocates
For the Respondents
:-
Mr. Prabir Kumar Bhowmik, Ms. Sucharita Biswas, Mr,. Kaushik Dey, Mr.Tapan Bhanja, Mr. P.K. Bhowmick, Mr. Tilak Mitra, Mr. Uday ShankarBhattacharyya, Ms. Ekta Sinha, Mr. Abhisek Addhya, Mr. Smarajit RayChowdhury, Advocates
Dated : 19[th] January, 2022
MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.
Heard Learned Counsels appearing for the parties.
In view of involvement of common question of law and similarity of factsin all these Writ Petitions, with the consent of the parties all these WritPetitions have been heard together and are being decided by the presentcommon judgement and order.
Common facts and issues involved in all these Writ Petitions as appearon perusal of relevant record and upon considering the submissions of theparties are that the petitioners are aggrieved by the issuance of impugnednotices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 on the ground thatthe same are barred by limitation and the respondent Income Tax Authorityconcerned, before issuing the impugned notices under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, have not observed the statutory formalities under Section148 A of the Income Tax Act as prescribed by the Finance Act, 2021 whichare applicable with effect from 1[st] April, 2021 before issuance of noticesunder Section 148 of the Act on or after 1[st] April, 2021.
Issues arising in all the present Writ Petitions are purely legal and in allthese Writ Petitions the assessees/petitioners have sought relief of quashingof the impugned re-assessment notices issued post 31[st] March, 2021 by the
Issues arising in all the present Writ Petitions are purely legal and in allthese Writ Petitions the assessees/petitioners have sought relief of quashingof the impugned re-assessment notices issued post 31[st] March, 2021 by the
respondent Income Tax Authority concerned under Section 148 of theIncome Tax Act, assessees/petitioners have also sought relief by way of adeclaration declaring Explanations A(a)(ii)/A(b) to the Notification No. 20[S.O. 1432 (E) dated 31[st] March, 2021 and Notification No. 38 [S.O.1703 (E)]dated 27[th] April, 2021 to the extent that the same extend the applicability ofthe “provisions of Section 148, Section 149 and Section 151 of the Act, asthe case may be, as they stood as on the 31[st] March, 2021, before thecommencement of the Finance Act, 2021” to the period beyond 31[st] March,2021 as ultra vires the parent legislation, viz., The Taxation and Other Laws(Relaxation and Amendment of Certain Provisions) Act, 2020 (hereinafterreferred to as ‘ Relaxation Act, 2020’).
At the outset, all the counsels appearing for the parties jointlysubmitted that the issues involved in these Writ Petitions are covered by thedecision of the Division Bench of the Allahabad High Court dated 30[th]September, 2021 in the case of ‘Ashok Kumar Agarwal –vs- Union of Indiathrough its Revenue Secretary North Block & Ors.’ (Writ Tax No. 524/2021)decided in favour of assessees/petitioners on 30.09.2021 and order ofRajasthan High Court dated 25[th] November, 2021 in the case of Bpip InfraPrivate Limited-vs.- Income Tax Officer, Ward 4 (1), Jaipur (S.B. Civil WritPetition No. 13297/2021) and the order of Delhi High Court 15[th] December,2021 in the case of Man Mohan Kohli –vs- Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax & Anr. In (W.P. (C) 6176 of 2021) and judgement and order ofthis Court dated 17[th] January, 2022 in the case of Manoj Jain Vs. Union of
India & Ors. In WPA No. 11950 of 2021 and in the case of Bagaria Properitesand Investment Private Limited & Anr. In WPO 244 of 2021.
In view of judgement and order of this Court dated 17[th] January, 2022in the case of Manoj Jain Vs. Union of India & Ors. In WPA No. 11950 of2021 and in the case of Bagaria Properties and Investment Private Limited &Anr. in WPO No. 244 of 2021, all these Writ Petitions herein are disposed ofby allowing the same. Explanations A(a)(ii)/A(b) to the Notifications dated31st March, 2021 and 27th April, 2021 are declared to be ultra vires theRelaxation Act, 2020 and are therefore bad in law and null and void. All theimpugned notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act are quashedwith liberty to the Assessing Officers concerned to initiate fresh re-assessment proceedings in accordance with the relevant provisions of theAct as amended by Finance Act, 2021 and after making compliance of theformalities as required by the law.
Urgent certified photocopy of this order, if applied for, be supplied tothe parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.
(Md. Nizamuddin, J.)
Sbghosh
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.