Case Law › High Court › M/S Agriculture Produce Market Committee...

M/S Agriculture Produce Market Committee v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 12 Nov 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cmis
Parties
M/S Agriculture Produce Market Committee v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
12 Nov 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S Agriculture Produce Market Committee v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Issue: Whether approved for reporting ? __________________________________________________ For the Appellants: Mr.

Decision: As a result these appeals are disposed of on same terms.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA I.T.A. No. 69 of 2008 alongwith 41, 42, 45, 46, 47, 49 of 2010, 7, 8 and 9 of 2011 Date of decision : 12[th] November, 2013 ______________________________________________ 1.I.T.A. No. 69 of 2008 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent 2.I.T.A. No. 41 of 2010 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent 3.I.T.A. No. 42 of 2010 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent 4.I.T.A. No. 45 of 2010 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent 5.I.T.A. No. 46 of 2010 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent 6.I.T.A. No. 47 of 2010 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent 7.I.T.A. No. 49 of 2010 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent 8.I.T.A. No. 7 of 2011 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent 9.I.T.A. No. 8 of 2011 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent 10.I.T.A. No. 9 of 2011 M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee ..Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax …Respondent __________________________________________________ Coram : The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar, C.J. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice: Kuldip Singh, J. Whether approved for reporting ? __________________________________________________ For the Appellants: Mr. Ajay Vaidya, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vinay Kuthiala, Senior Advocate, with Ms. Vandana Kuthiala, Advocate. __________________________________________________ A.M. Khanwilkar, C.J. (Oral) It is not in dispute that the substantial questions of law, on which the present appeals have been admitted, have already been answered in the case of M/s Agriculture Produce Market Committee Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Shimla in I.T.A. No. 68 of 2008 and companion cases, decided on 19[th] April, 2012. As a result these appeals are disposed of on same terms. ( A.M. Khanwilkar ), Chief Justice 12[th ]November, 2013(K) ( Kudlip Singh ), Judge Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan