M/S. Ajanta International v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay City-Viii, Bombay
High Court
16 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. Ajanta International v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay City-Viii, Bombay
Date of order
16 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S. Ajanta International v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Bombay City-Viii, Bombay, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly the Reference is disposed of as not pressed and is returned unanswered.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX REFERENC NO. 35 OF 1997
M/s. Ajanta International
...Applicant
Versus
The Commissioner of Income-tax,Bombay City-VIII, Bombay.
...Respondent
Mr. Rajesh Poojari i/b M/s. Mulla & Mulla & Craigie Blunt & Caroe, for the Applicant.
Mr. D.K. Kamwal, for the Respondent.
---
CORAM: DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD & A.V. POTDAR, JJ.
March 16, 2012.
P.C.:-
1.
Counsel appearing on behalf of the Applicant states that he has
instructions not to press the Reference. Accordingly the Reference is disposed of as not pressed and is returned unanswered.
(A.V. POTDAR, J.)
(DR.D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue