M/S Allied Glasses Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income
High Court
11 Mar 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
M/S Allied Glasses Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income
Date of order
11 Mar 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Allied Glasses Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The writ petition shall consequently stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~53
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 16627/2022
M/S ALLIED GLASSES PVT. LTD ..... Petitioner Through: None
versus
%
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX 1(1) & ORS.
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Kunal Sharma, SSC with Ms. Zehra Khan, JSC & Mr. Shubhendu Bhattacharyya, Adv.
Mr. Kavinder Gill, Sr. Panel Counsel for R- 2 to 6.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
11.03.2024
Although learned counsels for the respondents are present, none has appeared for the writ petitioner when the matter was called. We note that none had attended to the writ petition even on the last occasion.
The writ petition shall consequently stand dismissed for want of prosecution.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MARCH 11, 2024/kk
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue