Case LawHigh Court › M/S Alpha Dairy Equipments, Through v. C...

M/S Alpha Dairy Equipments, Through v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur.raipur

High Court 12 Oct 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
M/S Alpha Dairy Equipments, Through v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur.raipur
Date of order
12 Oct 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Alpha Dairy Equipments, Through v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur.raipur, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPT No. 6003 of 2009 1. M/s Alpha Dairy Equipments, Through : Partner Sanjeev Agrawal, C-17, Parijat Commercial Complex, E-5, Arera Colony, Bhopal (M.P.) 17, Parijat Commercial Complex, E-5, Arera Colony, Bhopal (M.P.) ---- Petitioner Versus 1. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines, Raipur.Raipur. 2. The Asstt. Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, 32/32 Bungalow, Bhilai (CG)(CG) 3. The Director General (Investigation), Aaykar Bhawan, Bhopal (MP) 4. The Addl. Director Of Income Tax (Investigation), Central Revenue Building, Civil Lines Raipur (CG) Building, Civil Lines Raipur (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioner.:NoneFor Respondents.:Smt. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker 12/10/2015 Order On Board None for the petitioner even in the 2nd round. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Pritinker Diwaker) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan