Case LawHigh Court › M/S Amit Sales Corporation A Proprietors...

M/S Amit Sales Corporation A Proprietorship Firm Having It's Place Of Business At Gola Road, Muzaffarpur Through It's v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur

High Court 24 Mar 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · patnahcucisdb94
Parties
M/S Amit Sales Corporation A Proprietorship Firm Having It's Place Of Business At Gola Road, Muzaffarpur Through It's v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur
Date of order
24 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S Amit Sales Corporation A Proprietorship Firm Having It's Place Of Business At Gola Road, Muzaffarpur Through It's v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal under Section 281 of the Income-tax Act. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNACivil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3834 of 2015 ====================================================== M/s Amit Sales Corporation a Proprietorship firm having it's place of business at Gola Road, Muzaffarpur through it's proprietor Mohan Kumar Agrawal son of Late Chedi Prasad resident of 99 Pocket- 1, 2nd Floor, Jasola, New Delhi- 110076. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Muzaffarpur. 2. The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax Range-1, Muzaffarpur. 3. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle - 1, Bela Kothi, Bela, Muzaffarpur. 4. The HDFC Bank Ltd. Choti Saraiyaganj, Muzaffarpur through it's Branch Manager. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, Sr. S.C. Mrs. Archana Prasad, Jr. S.C. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH KUMAR DATTA) 3 24-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Sr. Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department. The petitioner has approached this Court against the order of attachment dated 12.03.2015 in exercise of powers under Section 281 B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. In the counter affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent it is stated that the bank accounts of the petitioner have been ordered to be released after obtaining an undertaking from the petitioner and extending cooperation in assessment proceeding by him. Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as infructuous. (Ramesh Kumar Datta, J) (Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan