Case Law › High Court › M/S Amolak Singh Kumar & Sons v. Commiss...

M/S Amolak Singh Kumar & Sons v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jalandhar

High Court 04 Jul 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

04 Jul 2014

Assessment year(s)

2006-07

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In M/S Amolak Singh Kumar & Sons v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Ii, Jalandhar, the High Court (2014) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 254 case law →Section 260A case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No. 101 of 2014 (O&M)Decided on : 04.07.2014 M/s Amolak Singh Kumar & Sons Versus Commissioner of Income Tax-II, Jalandhar . . . Appellant . . . Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH PRESENT: Mr. Ravish Sood, Advocate for the appellant. **** AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The challenge in this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act') is to the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar passed in ITA No. 124(ASR)/2012, dated 11.09.2013 for the assessment year 2006-07.2.After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant states that he may be allowed to withdraw the present appeal with liberty to the appellant to file an application under Section 254(2) of the Act for rectification of the order before the Tribunal. 2.Dismissed as withdrawn. It shall, however, be open to the appellant to take recourse to the remedies available to it in accordance with law. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE July 04, 2014J.Ram (JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.