Case LawHigh Court › M/S Anand Sagar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd v....

M/S Anand Sagar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax -1(1)Indore, Dated 03.04.2019

High Court 03 Apr 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
M/S Anand Sagar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax -1(1)Indore, Dated 03.04.2019
Date of order
03 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S Anand Sagar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax -1(1)Indore, Dated 03.04.2019, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH: BENCH AT INDORE W.P. No.6270/2019 M/s Anand Sagar Real Estate Pvt. Ltd. v/s Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax -1(1)Indore, dated 03.04.2019 Shri Ashish Goyal, learned counsel for thepetitioner. Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for therespondent. The petitioner before this Court has filed thispresent petition writ petition challenging theassessment order dated 31.12.2018 passed by theDeputy Commissioner of Income Tax for theassessment year 2011-12, which was reopened underSection 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Thepetitioner is also aggrieved by the notice issued underSections 143(2) and 142(1) dated 20.11.2018.However, the facts remains that a detailed assessmentorder has been passed in the matter on 31.12.2018 andthe petitioner has already preferred an appeal on15.01.2019. As the petitioner has already preferred an appealagainst the assessment order, the petitioner shallcertainly be free to raise all ground, as raised in thepresent writ petition, while assailing the appealpreferred against the assessment order. In light of the aforesaid, this Court does not findany reason to interfere with the assessment orderpassed by the competent authority, as an appeal isalready pending and the appellate authority can certainly look into the aforesaid fact also.Resultantly, the admission is declined. Certified copy, as per rules. (S.C. SHARMA) J U D G E (S.K. AWASTHI) J U D G E Ravi Digitally signed by Ravi Prakash Date: 2019.04.04 17:52:32 +05'30'
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan