Case Law › High Court › Ms. Ananya Rath, Advocate v. The Appeal...

Ms. Ananya Rath, Advocate v. The Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed

High Court 20 Jul 2022 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · cisnc

Parties

Date of order

20 Jul 2022

Assessment year(s)

2009-10

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ms. Ananya Rath, Advocate v. The Appeal Is Accordingly Dismissed, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK ITA No. 15 of 2019 ….Appellant Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central), Visakhapatnam Mr. R.S. Chimanka, Senior Standing Counsel -versus- ….Respondent Basukinath Roadways Pvt. Ltd. Ms. Ananya Rath, Advocate CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDEROrder No. 20.07.2022 1. In view of the order of this Court dated 5[th] July, 2022 in ITA No.94 of 2018 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) v. M/s. Midas Capital Pvt. Ltd.), the questions urged by the Revenue in the present appeal which is directed against the order dated 5[th]December, 2018 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Cuttack (ITAT) in ITA No. 204/CTK/2018 for the assessment year 2009-10 are declined to be framed. 05. 2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge S.K. Jena/Secy.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.