Case LawHigh Court › Ms. Anjali Mohan Jacthap v. Ms. Ameeta S...

Ms. Anjali Mohan Jacthap v. Ms. Ameeta Saini

High Court 03 Jun 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Ms. Anjali Mohan Jacthap v. Ms. Ameeta Saini
Date of order
03 Jun 2020
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ms. Anjali Mohan Jacthap v. Ms. Ameeta Saini, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal.

Decision: Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present contempt petition is disposed of as satisfied.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~ IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS.(C) 271/2020 MS. ANJALI MOHAN JACTHAP ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Rana, Advocate with Ms. Mamta, Advocate. ..... Petitioner versus MS. AMEETA SAINI, DIRECTOR GENERAL (INVESTIGATIONS), INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Sr. Standing counsel for Income Tax Dept. with Mr. Parth Semwal, Advocate. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 03.06.2020 CM Appl.11723/2020 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Cont. Cas.(C) 271/2020 The present contempt petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The matter has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present contempt petition has been filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, on behalf of the petitioner against the contemnors-respondents alleging wilful disobedience of the order dated 17[th]January, 2020 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) No.8245/2019 whereby the Court directed the respondents-contemnors to forthwith refund the amount seized during the search proceedings along with interest in accordance with law. In the present petition, it has been averred that in pursuance to the order dated 17[th] January, 2020, the respondents-contemnors had refunded the principal amount of Rs.30,69,926/- on 27[th] February, 2020. Today, learned counsel for petitioner states that interest amount has been refunded by the respondents-contemnors vide voucher No.ITC/Aq/053952 dated 02[nd] June, 2020 for Rs.23,17,794/-. However, learned counsel for petitioner states that the computation sheet should be supplied indicating as to how the interest amount has been calculated. Mr. Zoheb Hossain, learned senior Standing counsel for respondents-contemnors states that the computation sheet shall be provided to the petitioner within one week. Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present contempt petition is disposed of as satisfied. Registry is directed to list W.P.(C) No.8245/2019 pending between the same parties on 15[th] June, 2020. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through email. MANMOHAN, J JUNE 03, 2020 js SANJEEV NARULA, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Respond to a penalty notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan