M/S Annlpurna Business Solutions, 6-3-866/A, Suite v. A. Siva Kartikeya
High Court
06 Jan 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
M/S Annlpurna Business Solutions, 6-3-866/A, Suite v. A. Siva Kartikeya
Date of order
06 Jan 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Annlpurna Business Solutions, 6-3-866/A, Suite v. A. Siva Kartikeya, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO
INCOME TAX TRIBUNAL APPEAL NO: 78 OF 202'l
lncome tax Tribunar Appear under section 260-4 of the rncome tax Act, 1961,against the order of the rncome Tax Appeflate Tribunar, Hyderabad Bench-B,Hyderabad in l.T-A. No. 836/ Hydt 201s for Assessmentyeat 2o1o-1.t dated 17-12-2019 preferred against the order of the commissioner of rncome Tax (Appears),12 Hvderabad dated 31-03-2015 in trA Nos. 269 to 274 tctr (A)-12lHyd t2014-1s ,preferred against the order of the Deputy commissioner of lncome Tax , centralCircle -3, Hyderabad dated 31-03-20i3 in pAN/GtR No. AAGFA5343e.
Between:
Principal commissioner of .lncome Tax-1, 7th Floor, A-Block, l.T.Towers, A. c.Guards, Masabtank, Hyderabad - 5OO 004.Guards, Masabtank, Hyderabad - 5OO 004.
...APPELLANT
AND
M/s Annlpurna Business Solutions, 6-3-866/A, Suite No. 401, Maheswari Mekinslrlayank Plaza, Greentands Road, Begumpet, Hyderabad. (pAN N;. AAG-rAsC+5ol
...RESPONDENT
Counsel for the Appellant: Ms. B. SAPNA REDDY, JUNIOR SC representingSRl. J. V.PRASAD, Senior Standing Counset FOR INCOME TAX
Counsel for the Respondent: SRI A. V. A. SIVA KARTIKEYA
The Court delivered the following Judgment :
THE HON'BLE THE [ JUSTICE][ ALO] ANDTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE [J.]
INCOME TAX [No.78 ][of ][2O2l]
JUDGMENT:("er llre Ho 'bletheCt ef Juslice [AIok ][Aradhe)]
Ms. B.Sapna Reddy, [learned ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel representing [Mr. ][J-V.Prasad, ][learned ][Senior]Counsel [for ][Income ][Tax ][Department ][for ][the]Standing appellant
2. Learne<l counsel [for ][the appellant ][seeks ][leave ][of ][this]Court to rvrthdraw [the ][appeal ][in ][the light ][of ][the ][Circular]No.O9 12024, dated [17.09.2024' ][wt'tln ][the liberty to ][revive]the same in case [the ][subject ][matter ][of ][the ][appeal ][falls ][in]any of the exceptions [provided ][in ][the ][Circular ][No'5/2O24]dated 15.03.:2O24.
athe [appeal ][is ][dismissed ][as ][withdrawn in]Accordrngly, terms of tl-rc [tiberty ][as ][prayed ][for]Accordrngly, terms of tl-rc [tiberty ][as ][prayed ][for]
II
Miscellaneous applications pending, it any, shall
stand closed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMAJOTNT REGTSTRARSEION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,.
1. The lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench_B, Hyderabad
'Iffi ,:;1Tl'"'i:TLfl ,f ,I:H:^LTJiEf, lfi f]:1,?iTi"if .BX',Aayakar,I:H:^LTJiEf, lfi f]:1,?iTi"if .BX',Aayakar
3. Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax , Cenhal Circle -3, Hyderabad.
' fldFfi? to sRl J v PRASAD, Senior Standins counset FoR TNCoME rAx,
5. One CC to SRI. A, V. A. S|VA KART|KEyA, Advocate IOPUCI
6. Two CD Cbpies
@)
HIGH COURT
DATED:0610112025
Judgment
ITTA.No.78 of [2021]
DISMISSING [ITI'A ]
WITHDRAWN
w
rl-t$-i6c- [SIlr]CcI:u31 ,;li 2125+taa)r.,-A [+i.r ][t: ][i\]:
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.