M/S Ardra Associates v. Parameswaran Managing
High Court
27 Jan 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
M/S Ardra Associates v. Parameswaran Managing
Date of order
27 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Ardra Associates v. Parameswaran Managing, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA
FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2017/7TH MAGHA, 1938
WP(C).No. 2700 of 2017 (J) ---------------------------
PETITIONER:-----------
M/S ARDRA ASSOCIATES,REPRESENTED BY MR. V. PARAMESWARAN MANAGING PARTNER, CAPITAL TOWERS, PATTURAIKKAL JUNCTION,TRICHUR - 680 022
BY ADVS.SRI.SHERRY SAMUEL OOMMEN SRI.NEMISH NIRANJAN ZAVERI
RESPONDENT(S):--------------
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-01-2017, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
---------------------------
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF ASSESSMENT U/S 143(3)
OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961 DATED 14-12-2016.
EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE OF DEMAND U/S. 156 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 DATED 14-12-2016.THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 DATED 14-12-2016.
EXHIBIT P3 :TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL BEARING NO.569803031231216 DATED 23/12/2016 PREFERRED U/S 246A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961.NO.569803031231216 DATED 23/12/2016 PREFERRED U/S 246A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT,1961.
EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR STAY OF RECOVERY DATED 23/12/2016.RECOVERY DATED 23/12/2016.
EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE LETTERS DATED 10-01-2017 AND
23-01-2017.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
mbr/
P.S. TO JUDGE
P.V.ASHA, J.
W.P.(C) No.2700 of 2017
Dated this the 27[th] day of January, 2017
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved by Ext.P1 order of assessment.
Petitioner has already submitted Ext.P3 appeal along with stay petitionExt.P4. Since demand notice is issued as per Ext.P2 petitioner seeksimmediate orders on Ext.P4 stay petition.
2. I heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedstanding counsel for the respondents.
In view of the circumstances stated above, there shall be adirection to the 2[nd] respondent to pass orders on Ext.P4 application ofstay within a period of six weeks. Till then there shall be stay offurther proceedings on the basis of Ext.P2.
rkc
Sd/-
P.V.ASHA
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.