M/S. Bagmane Developers Pvt. Limitedlake View Building v. Raman Nagar,Bangalore
High Court
08 Jul 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
M/S. Bagmane Developers Pvt. Limitedlake View Building v. Raman Nagar,Bangalore
Date of order
08 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
2005-06
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Bagmane Developers Pvt. Limitedlake View Building v. Raman Nagar,Bangalore, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE.
Dated this the 8[th]day of July, 2014|
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N KUMAR|
ANTI
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B MANOHAR
ITA Crob. No. 26/2011IN
ITA No. 1146/201
BETWEEN:
M/s. Bagmane Developers Pvt. LimitedLake View Building,No.66/ 1-4, A Block,8[th]Floor, Bagmane Tech Park,C. V. Raman Nagar,Bangalore.
...Cross-objector
(By Sri Chythanya. K. K., Adv.)
AND:
1.)The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)Central Revenue Buildings,Queens Road,Bangalore.Central Revenue Buildings,Queens Road,Bangalore.
oOThe Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax|
Central Circle — 2(3),
C.R. Building,Queens Road,Queens Road,
Bangalore... Respondents
(By Sri E.I. Sanmathi, Adv.)
This [TA Crob. filed under Order XLII Rule 1 read withOrder XLI Rule 22 CPC arising out of order dated 03.12.2010 in|ITA No.383/Bang/2010 for the assessment year 2005-06 praying|to (i) formulate the substantial questions of law stated therein; (11)allow the cross objection appeal and set aside the findings to the|extent against the cross-objector in the order passed by theTribunal in ITA No.383/Bang/2010 dated 03.12.2010.
This ITA Crob. coming on for Admission this day, |
N. KUMAR J‘delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
A memo is filed by the learned counsel for the cross-objector
seeking leave of this Court to withdraw the cross-objection with|liberty to file a fresh appeal.
The memo is taken on record. The Cross-objection is.dismissed. Liberty sought for is granted.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
VP
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue