Case Law › High Court › M/S Basant v. Union Of India

M/S Basant v. Union Of India

High Court 25 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · rhcjodh240618

Parties

Date of order

25 Jan 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Basant v. Union Of India, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Application for disposal of the writ petition is hereby allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11897/2010 M/s Basant, through its Partner, Vinay Kumar Jain S/o Late ShriSukh Veer Jain, age 46 years, R/o A-175, Circuit House Road,Jodhpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Union Of India through the Secretary to the Government ofIndia, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, New Delhi.2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-3, Jodhpur. 3. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(1), Jodhpur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anjay KothariFor Respondent(s): Mr. Sunil Bhandari HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG 25/01/2021 Order The matter comes upon an application for disposal of the writpetition in the light of the judgment dated 25.01.2018 (D.B.Income Tax Appeal No.76/2010 alongwith other connectedmatters). Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute theabove proposition. Application for disposal of the writ petition is hereby allowed. Hence, the instant writ petition filed by the petitioner isallowed and the impugned notice dated 26.02.2010 (Annx.4) andorder dated 16.12.2010 (Annx.9) are hereby quashed and setaside. Stay petition is also decided accordingly. (MANOJ KUMAR GARG),J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.