M/S. Basil Exports Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 2(1
High Court
01 Mar 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S. Basil Exports Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 2(1
Date of order
01 Mar 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Basil Exports Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 2(1, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
ITXA-1798.sxw
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1798 OF 2011
M/s. Basil Exports Pvt. Ltd.
v.Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 2(1).
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
Mr. A.K.Jasani for the Appellant.
Mr. Vimal Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Padma Divakar for the Respondent.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND M.S. SANKLECHA, JJ.
DATE : 1st March, 2013
PC:
In this appeal by the revenue following questions have been raised for our consideration.
a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the order of the Tribunal which was passed three months after the date of hearing, is contrary to the facts and submissions on record is based on irrelevant and incorrect facts and is in gross violation of the principles of natural justice and hence it is untenable in law and perverse?
b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the provisions of section 41(1) are applicable in the present case?
2)Since the Tribunal by impugned order has restored the issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh decision by keeping the contentions open to be urged before the Assessing officer, we see
no reason to entertain the present appeal.
3)Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to
costs.
4)The Assessing officer would apply his mind to the issue raised before him without being influenced by the observations made by the Tribunal in his order dated 21/12/2010.
(M.S.SANKLECHA, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.