Case Law › High Court › M/S. Batliwala & Karani v. Asst. Commiss...

M/S. Batliwala & Karani v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai & Ors

High Court 17 Feb 2009 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Batliwala & Karani v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,Mumbai & Ors, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.1663 OF 2007IN INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.372 OF 2007 M/s. Batliwala & Karani. .... Appellant Vs. Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax,Mumbai & Ors. ..... Respondents Ms. Aarti Sathe for the appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. RANJANA DESAI & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 17TH FEBRUARY, 2009. P.C. :- Learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission towithdraw the chamber summons. Chamber summons is allowed tobe withdrawn and is disposed of a such. [SMT. RANJANA DESAI, J.] [J.P. DEVADHAR, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.