In M/S. B.d. Estate Trust Mumbai v. The Deputy Commissioner Ofincome Tax, Special Range 40, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Appeal is withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.285 OF 2003
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 288 OF 2003
WITH
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 289 OF 2003
M/s. B.D. Estate Trust Mumbai
: Appellant
v/s
The Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Special Range 40
: Respondent
Mr. Atul K. Jasani for AppellantNone for respondent
Coram : Dr. S. RadhakrishnanS.J. Kathawalla, JJ.
Date : 1.9.2008
P.C.
.
Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
appeal. Appeal is withdrawn and dismissed as such.
Permissible court fees be refunded as per rules.
(S.J. Kathawalla,J.)
(Dr. S.Radhakrishnan,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue