Case Law › High Court › M/S. Bhaskar Infrastructure & Developers...

M/S. Bhaskar Infrastructure & Developers v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax (Central), Aaykar Bhavan, Nagpur And Others

High Court 07 Mar 2013 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

07 Mar 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Bhaskar Infrastructure & Developers v. Commissioner Ofincome Tax (Central), Aaykar Bhavan, Nagpur And Others, the High Court (2013) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

1 wp173.13.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. Writ Petition No.173 of 2013 M/s. Bhaskar Infrastructure & Developers vs. Commissioner ofIncome Tax (Central), Aaykar Bhavan, Nagpur and others Office Notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's order of directions and Registrar's orders Shri N.S.Bhattad, counsel for the petitioner.Shri A.Parchure, counsel for R-1 to 3. CORAM: B.P. DHARMADHIKARI & A.B. CHAUDHARI, JJ.DATED: 09th MAY, 2013. Though Civil Application (CAW) No.58 of 2013 was allowed, the petitioner has not carried out the amendment. Hence, we impose costs of Rs.2,000/- upon the petitioner. Costs are made payable to the the High Court Legal Services Sub Committee, Nagpur. If costs are not paid within a period of 6 (six) weeks from today, the matter shall be placed for further consideration before this Court. JUDGEJUDGE !! BRW !!

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.