In M/S. Binori Buildcon v. Income Tax Officer Ward 3(3)(1, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4018 of 2022
==========================================================
M/S. BINORI BUILDCON
Versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 3(3)(1)
==========================================================Appearance:MR KETAN H SHAH(2705) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 14/03/2022
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Mr. Ketan Shah, the learned senior counsel appearing for thewrit-applicant does not to press this writ-application and seekspermission to withdraw the same.
Permission as prayed for is granted. This writ-application isdisposed of as not pressed without expressing any opinion on themerits of the case.
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
A. B. VAGHELA
(NISHA M. THAKORE,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue