M/S. Biowin Agro Researchvemom,Mananthavady,Waynad v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
High Court
23 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
M/S. Biowin Agro Researchvemom,Mananthavady,Waynad v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna
Date of order
23 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Biowin Agro Researchvemom,Mananthavady,Waynad v. Menonmeera V.menonr.sreejithk.krishna, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 23 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2022 / 2ND AGRAHAYANA, 1944
WP(C) NO. 37401 OF 2022
PETITIONER:
M/S. BIOWIN AGRO RESEARCHVEMOM,MANANTHAVADY,WAYNAD, REPRESENTED BY ITSDIRECTOR, JOHN JOSEPH., PIN - 670645BY ADVS.HARISANKAR V. MENONMEERA V.MENONR.SREEJITHK.KRISHNA
RESPONDENTS:1THE INCOME TAX OFFICEREXEMPTION WARD,AAYAKAR BHAVAN,NORTH BLOCKMANANCHIRAKOZHIKODE, PIN - 6730012THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL1ST FLOOR, BLOCK C-I & C-II,KENDRIYA BHAVAN, KAKKANAD,KOCHI, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682037
ADV. CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM (SC)
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23.11.2022, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
W.P. (C) No. 37401 of 2022
JUDGMENT
Dated this the 23[rd] day of November, 2022
The petitioner suffered Ext.P1 order of assessment
under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for theassessment year 2017-2018. The petitioner filed Ext.P3
appeal along with Ext.P4 stay petition. The petitionerapprehends that pending consideration of the stay petition,the proceedings may be taken to recover amounts dueunder Ext.P1 order of assessment.
2.The learned standing counsel appearing for therespondent department states that the appellate authoritymay be directed to consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 staypetition and till such time the orders are passed, no stepswill be taken to recover the amounts due under Ext.P1 orderof assessment.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the
3.Having regard to the submissions made, this writ
W.P. (C) No. 37401 of 2022
..3..
petition will stand disposed of directing the 2[nd] respondentto consider and pass orders on Ext.P4 stay petition, afteraffording to the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.Till such time as orders are passed on Ext.P4 stay petitionfiled in Ext.P3 appeal, any steps initiated for recovery of theamounts due under Ext.P1 order of assessment shall bekept in abeyance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
RMV
Sd/-
GOPINATH P.
JUDGE
..4..
APPENDIX OF WP(C) 37401/2022
PETITIONER EXHIBITSExhibit P1Exhibit P2
Exhibit P1COPY OF ASSESSMENT ORDER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DTD. 30-12-2019Exhibit P2COPY OF ORDER ISSUED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEALS, NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE, DELHI FOR THE YEAR 2017-18 DTD. 30-10-2021Exhibit P3COPY OF APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. NIL Exhibit P4COPY OF STAY PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORETHE 2ND RESPONDENT DTD. 14-10-2022
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A.TO JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.