Case LawHigh Court › M/S Britto Amusements Pvt. Ltd And Anr v...

M/S Britto Amusements Pvt. Ltd And Anr v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr

High Court 15 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
M/S Britto Amusements Pvt. Ltd And Anr v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
Date of order
15 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S Britto Amusements Pvt. Ltd And Anr v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOAMISC.CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 132 OF 2011IN WRIT PETITION NO. 858 OF 2010 M/S BRITTO AMUSEMENTS PVT. LTD AND ANR. Versus THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX AND ANR. ... Applicant ... Respondent Mr. M.S. Sonak with Mr. P. S. Rao, Advocates for petitioners.Ms. Asha Dessai, Advocate for respondent. P.C. -Coram:S. C. DHARMADHIKARI &F. M. REIS, JJ.-Date:15th March, 2011 This miscellaneous application for amendment is to incorporatethe events set out in the schedule. The events mentioned in the schedule are subsequent to theinstitution of the present petition without entering into thecontroversy on maintainability of the petition and merits and keepingopen the contentions of parties in that behalf open, the Application ismade absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Amendment be carriedout within a period of one week. Miscellaneous application disposedof. S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J. ef.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan