In M/S. Bureau Veritas Indian Division v. Additional Commissioner Ofincome Taxmumbai, the High Court (2007) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: P.C.:- 2.The learned counsel for the appellantseeks leave to withdraw the above appeals.The appeals are allowed to be withdrawn anddismissed as such.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION.
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.335/2007.
M/s. Bureau Veritas Indian Division.
Vs.
Additional Commissioner ofIncome TaxMumbai.
With
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.413/2005.
M/s. Bureau Veritas Indian Division.
Vs.
Joint Commissioner ofIncome Tax Mumbai.
With
INCOME TAX APPEAL No.433/2005.
M/s. Bureau Veritas Indian Division.
Vs.
Joint Commissioner ofIncome Tax Mumbai.
Ms. Asifa Khan for Appellant in all theAppeals.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
..Appellant.
..Respondent.
CORAM:DR.S. RADHAKRISHNANAND V.C. DAGA,JJ.DATED:26TH MARCH, 2007.
P.C.:-
2.The learned counsel for the appellantseeks leave to withdraw the above appeals.The appeals are allowed to be withdrawn anddismissed as such.
3.Proper court fee be refunded in allabove three appeals as per rules.
(V.C. DAGA,J.)
(DR.R. RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue