Case LawHigh Court › M/S. C. Parida And Associate, Advocates...

M/S. C. Parida And Associate, Advocates v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar And Others

High Court 31 Oct 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
M/S. C. Parida And Associate, Advocates v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar And Others
Date of order
31 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In M/S. C. Parida And Associate, Advocates v. Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar And Others, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Order No. 01. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.23359 of 2022 Jaya Chandra Behera Petitioner …. M/s. C. Parida and associate, Advocates -versus- Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhubaneswar and others Opposite Parties …. Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, Senior Standing Counsel for IT Department CORAM: THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M. S. RAMAN ORDER 31.10.2022 1. Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department enters appearance for the Opposite Parties and files his appearance memo in Court today, which is taken on record. 2. The real challenge in the present petition is to Annexure-4, which is an assessment order under Section 147 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) dated 26[th]March, 2022 for the Assessment Year (AY) 2015-16. 3. Admittedly, the impugned order is an appealable order. 4. Consequently, permitting the Petitioner to avail of the remedy of an appeal against the said impugned order and reserving the right of the Petitioner to raise all pleas including the points urged in the present petition before the Appellate Authority in accordance with law, this Court declines to interfere at this stage. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. (Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M. S. Raman) Judge M. Panda
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan