M/S. Caltradeco Steels Pvt. Ltd. And Anr v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Kolkata And 2 Others
High Court
11 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
M/S. Caltradeco Steels Pvt. Ltd. And Anr v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Kolkata And 2 Others
Date of order
11 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S. Caltradeco Steels Pvt. Ltd. And Anr v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 6(1), Kolkata And 2 Others, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
ORDER SHEETWPO/145/2020IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTACONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTIONORIGINAL SIDE
M/S. CALTRADECO STEELS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.VSASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 6(1),KOLKATA AND 2 OTHERS
BEFORE:The Hon'ble JUSTICE MD. NIZAMUDDINDate : 11[th] April, 2022.
Appearance:Mr. R.N. Dutt, Adv.Ms. Sutapa Roy Choudhury, Adv.Ms. Aratrika Roy, Adv.…For the PetitionerMr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv.…For the respondent
The Court : Heard learned advocates appearing for the parties.
In this matter, petitioner has challenged the impugned order ofrejection of the petitioner’s application under Section 220 sub-section(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 17[th] February, 2020 during thepedency of the faceless appeal in question which was filed on 6[th]January, 2020 on the ground of high-pitched demand.
Considering the submissions of the parties and in view of the factthat more than two years have been passed after filing of the appeal inquestion and which has not been disposed yet and taking intoconsideration this fact, this writ petition being WPO 145 of 2020 isdisposed of by directing the authority concerned to dispose of thepending appeal in question of the petitioner relating to assessmentyear 2017-18 within twelve weeks from date positively. No coercive
action shall be taken by the respondents during the pendency of theappeal in question and recovery of any further demand will dependupon the final outcome of the appeal in question.
With these observations and directions, this writ petition standsdisposed of.
(MD. NIZAMUDDIN, J.)
TR/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.