M/S Cannon Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(1)(2) Mumbai & Ors
High Court
11 Nov 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
M/S Cannon Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(1)(2) Mumbai & Ors
Date of order
11 Nov 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Cannon Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1(1)(2) Mumbai & Ors, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, this Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
dik
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1810 OF 2006
M/s Cannon Industries Pvt. Ltd. & Anr....PetitionersvsThe Income Tax Officer Ward 1(1)(2) Mumbai & Ors ...Respondents
.....
None for the PetitionersMr Pinto for the Respondents.
.....
CORAM : M.S.SANKLECHA & S.C. GUPTE, JJ.
NOVEMBER 11, 2014
P.C. :
Mr Pinto, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that this Petition along with other similar Petitions challenging Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”), were transferred for final disposal by the Hon'ble Supreme Court to the Hon'ble Gujrat High Court. Mr Pinto further informs us that on 15 April 2013, Hon'ble Gujrat High Court has finally disposed of this Petition along with other Petitions upholding the challenge to Section 80HHC of the Act. In view of the above, this Petition is to be treated as disposed of in the record of this Court. Accordingly, this Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
( S.C.GUPTE J. )
( M.S.SANKLECHA J. )
Pg 1 of 1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.