Case LawHigh Court › M/S Chandigarh Housing Board v. Deputy C...

M/S Chandigarh Housing Board v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle (1), Sector 17-E, Chandigarh Andanotner

High Court 27 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Chandigarh Housing Board v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle (1), Sector 17-E, Chandigarh Andanotner
Date of order
27 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Chandigarh Housing Board v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle (1), Sector 17-E, Chandigarh Andanotner, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH 119 Civil Writ Petition No.8038 of 2019Decided on: 27.03.2019! M/s Chandigarh Housing Board Versus _.. Petitioner Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle (1), Sector 17-E, Chandigarh andanotner| ... Respondents CORAMN:HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present:Ms. Radhika Suri, Senior Advocate withMr. Manpreet Singh Kanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Urvasni Dnugga, sr. Standing Counsel for the respondent. 1111 AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral) The prayer maae in this petition filed under Articles 226/22/ of theConstitution of India, is for issuance of a writ in the nature ofCertiorar, tor settingaside the orders dated 12.02.2019 and 20.03.2019 (Annexures P-5 & P-7$respectively, rejecting tne stay application filed by the petitioner. 2 Learned counsel for tne petitioner states tnat after filing of tne writpetition, an amount ot S|49,11,92,382/- has been recovered from the account ofthe petitioner on 25.03.2019, whicn action Is required to be impugned,Accordingly, a prayer was made that she may be allowed to witndraw the presentwrit petition with liberty to the petitioner to file fresh one on the same cause ofaction and also impugning the attachment and recovery ofy49_.11,92,382/- madby the Department. 3 Dismissed as withdrawn. It snall, nowever, be open to the petitionerto take recourse to the remedies as may be available to it, In accordance withlaw. (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)JUDGE March 27, 2019sonia gugnani (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:SONIA GUGNANI2019.03.28 15:56venether Reportable Yes/NoYes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan