M/S Chandigarh Overseas Pvt. Ltd. And Another v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds), Chandigarh And Others
High Court
27 Mar 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Chandigarh Overseas Pvt. Ltd. And Another v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds), Chandigarh And Others
Date of order
27 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In M/S Chandigarh Overseas Pvt. Ltd. And Another v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds), Chandigarh And Others, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CRM-M-37474-2018 (O & M)Date of Decision: 27.03.2019
M/s Chandigarh Overseas Pvt. Ltd. and another|
Versus
_.. Petitioners
Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax (TDS), Chandigarh and others
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH
Present:Mr. Rohit Kaura, Advocate and
Mr. Rajshekhar, Advocate,
for the petitioners.
Mr. Ajay Aggarwal, Advocate forMr. Denesh Goyal, Sr. Standing Counsel,for the respondents-Income Tax Department.
INDERJIT SINGH, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners wants to withdraw the
present petition with liberty to file application firstly before the trial Courtfor staying of the proceedings.
Dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.
It is made clear that if any such application is filed by thepetitioners, the trial Court shall decide the same expeditiously in accordance
with law.
27.03.2019parveen kumar
(INDERJIT SINGH)JUDGE)
Note’Whether speaking/reasoned: YesWhether reportable!NO
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue