M/S Cognizant Technology Solutionsindia Private Limitedrepresented By Its Directormr.thiagarajan Krishnaraj v. The Additional Director Of Income-Tax, (Transfer Pricing), 6[Th] Floor, B Block, I T Towers A.c.guards, Hyderabad-500 004
High Court
06 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
M/S Cognizant Technology Solutionsindia Private Limitedrepresented By Its Directormr.thiagarajan Krishnaraj v. The Additional Director Of Income-Tax, (Transfer Pricing), 6[Th] Floor, B Block, I T Towers A.c.guards, Hyderabad-500 004
Date of order
06 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Cognizant Technology Solutionsindia Private Limitedrepresented By Its Directormr.thiagarajan Krishnaraj v. The Additional Director Of Income-Tax, (Transfer Pricing), 6[Th] Floor, B Block, I T Towers A.c.guards, Hyderabad-500 004, the High Court (2019) decided the matter under Section 133 of the Income-tax Act.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
M/s Cognizant Technology SolutionsIndia Private LimitedRepresented by its DirectorMr.Thiagarajan Krishnaraj...Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Additional Director of Income-Tax, (Transfer Pricing), 6[th] Floor, B Block, I T Towers A.C.Guards, Hyderabad-500 004
2.The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110 001 ...Respondents
Prayer:- Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of theConstitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ ofCertiorari, calling for the records comprised in the noticeNo.TPO/Hyd/133(6)/2009-10/767, dated 29.12.2009, and theconsequential order in notice No.TPO/Hyd/133(6)/2009-10 dated29.01.2010 on the file of the 1[st] respondent and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.N.V.BalajiFor Respondent : Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan Senior Standing CounselO R D E R
Learned counsel for the respondent states that nothingsurvives in the present writ petition.
2. Thus, bearing in mind the elapse of time between thedate of impugned communication and today as well as recordingthe statement made by learned counsel for the respondent, thiswrit petition is closed. Liberty is always available to therespondent to issue a fresh notice in terms of Section 133 ofthe Income Tax Act, 1961, strictly in line with theprescriptions set out therein
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
3. This writ petition is closed in the aforesaid terms. Nocosts.
-s/d-Assistant RegistrarTrue CopySub-Assistant RegistrarskaTo1.The Additional Director of Income-Tax, (Transfer Pricing), 6[th] Floor, B Block, I T Towers A.C.Guards, Hyderabad-500 0042.The Union of India, Represented by its Secretary to Government, Ministry of Finance, North Block, New Delhi-110 001+1 cc to Mr.N.V.Balaji Advocate sr78194+1 cc to Mrs.Hema Muralikrishnan Advocate sr77283W.P.No.3617 of 2010pa(co)aa21/10/2019
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue