M/S Collins And Company, Rep v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:1St October, 2012
High Court
01 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
M/S Collins And Company, Rep v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:1St October, 2012
Date of order
01 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Collins And Company, Rep v. Bakre, Jj.-Date:1St October, 2012, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOATAX APPEAL NO. 54 OF 2012
M/S COLLINS AND COMPANY, REP. THROUGH ITS MANAGING PARTNER, SHRI DANIEL SHAH VersusTHE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AND 2 ORS.,
... Appellant
... Respondents
Mr. S.R. Rivonkar, Advocate for the appellant.
Ms. Asha Dessai, Advocate for the respondents.
P.C.:-
-Coram:S. J. VAZIFDAR &U. V. BAKRE, JJ.-Date:1st October, 2012
This is an appeal against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal dated 19/11/2010 dismissing the appellant's appeals No.IT(SC) No. 80 and 81/Mum/2009 relating to the block period01/04/1996 to 18/02/2003.
2. The first appeal before the Tribunal related to the quantumproceedings and second related to the penalty proceedings. Admittedly, in the quantum proceedings the appeal before CIT(Appeals) was filed after a delay of three years and eighteen days andthe appeal to the Tribunal was filed after a delay of two years andfour months. In the penalty proceedings, there was delay of twoyears and four months in filing the appeal before the CIT(Appeals).
3. The Tribunal by the impugned order has declined to exercisediscretion in favour of the appellant by condoning the delay. We are
unable to say that the order is perverse. Accordingly no substantialquestion of law arises in this appeal.
4. The appeal stands dismissed.
S. J. VAZIFDAR, J.
mv
U. V. BAKRE, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.