Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Cosme Matias Menezes v. Commissione...

M/S. Cosme Matias Menezes v. Commissioner Of Income Tax With Its Office At

High Court 14 Nov 2011 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hcbgoa
Parties
M/S. Cosme Matias Menezes v. Commissioner Of Income Tax With Its Office At
Date of order
14 Nov 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Cosme Matias Menezes v. Commissioner Of Income Tax With Its Office At, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 588 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 225 OF 2011 M/S. COSME MATIAS MENEZES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX with its office at No.5, Patto, Aayakar Bhavan, Panaji Goa … Petitioner … Respondents Mr. Valmiki Menezes , Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Asha Desai, Advocate for the Respondents Coram:- A.P. LAVANDE AND U.V. BAKRE, JJ.thDate:- 14 November, 2011. P.C.:- Heard Mr. Menezes, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mrs. Desai, learned Counsel for the Respondents. This is an application for the amendment in Writ Petition No. 225 of 2011. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed. Amendment to the Petition to be carried out by 18[th] November,2011. The application stands disposed of. A.P. LAVANDE,J. U.V. BAKRE,J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan