M/S. D. K. Dwibedi And Associates, Advocates v. Principal Commissioner Of Income ….Opposite Parties Tax, Bhubaneswar-1 And Others
High Court
27 Jan 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
M/S. D. K. Dwibedi And Associates, Advocates v. Principal Commissioner Of Income ….Opposite Parties Tax, Bhubaneswar-1 And Others
Date of order
27 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. D. K. Dwibedi And Associates, Advocates v. Principal Commissioner Of Income ….Opposite Parties Tax, Bhubaneswar-1 And Others, the High Court (2023) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The writ petition is allowed, but in the circumstances, with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Order No.
02.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.36023 of 2022
….
Durga Madhab Satapathy
Petitioner
M/s. D. K. Dwibedi and associates, Advocates
-versus-
Principal Commissioner of Income ….Opposite Parties Tax, Bhubaneswar-1 and others
Mr. Tushar Kanti Satapathy, Senior Standing Counsel for
Revenue Department
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
27.01.2023
1. The Court has been shown a copy of the order dated 20[th] January,
2023 passed by the Supreme Court of India in SLP (C) Diary
No.39003 of 2022 (Principal Commissioner of Income Tax,
Sambalpur v. Om Prakash Poddar), which is a Department’s SLP against the order dated 14[th] March, 20222 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.5818 of 2022. The Court notes, however, that no stay has been granted of such order of this Court.
2. Following the order dated 14[th] March, 20222 passed by this
Court in W.P.(C) No.5818 of 2022, the impugned notice and all
M. Panda
consequential orders and steps taken thereunder hereby stand quashed.
3. The writ petition is allowed, but in the circumstances, with no order as to costs.
(Dr. S. Muralidhar) Chief Justice (M.S. Raman) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.