M/S Deep Mohinivs Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Global Reality I. T. A
High Court
04 Nov 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
M/S Deep Mohinivs Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Global Reality I. T. A
Date of order
04 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In M/S Deep Mohinivs Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Global Reality I. T. A, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the light of the law laid down in the case of M/sGlobal Reality (supra), there is no merit in the appeal.The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA-80-2016
(M/S DEEP MOHINIVs COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX)
04-11-2016
Shri A. P. Shrivastava, learned counsel for theappellant.
Denying claim for deduction under Section 80IB(10) of the Income Tax Act by the Income Tax AppellateTribunal for the assessment year 2007-08, appellant hasfiled this appeal. The claim of the appellant has beenrejected by the Tribunal on the basis of the judgmentrendered by this Court in the case of Commissioner ofIncome Tax Vs. M/s Global Reality I. T. A. No. 40/12.
Once, identical submissions and grounds havealready been rejected by a Co-ordinate Bench of thisCourt in the case of M/sGlobal Reality (supra), nosubstantial question of law arises for consideration.
Learned counsel for the appellant places reliance oncertain judgments of the Delhi High Court and theGujarat High Court to say that there are conflictingjudgments and, therefore, right to appeal is available oratleast permission to appeal to the Supreme Court shouldbe granted.
Once, a judgment has been rendered by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, the same is binding on thisCourt until and unless it is over-ruled or a different view
is taken by the Larger Bench.
In the light of the law laid down in the case of M/sGlobal Reality (supra), there is no merit in the appeal.The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
(RAJENDRA MENON)ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
(SMT. ANJULI PALO)JUDGE
vy
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.