Case Law › High Court › M/S Dhavalamrut Milk Traders v. Income T...

M/S Dhavalamrut Milk Traders v. Income Tax Officer,Ward 2(2), Jalgaon

High Court 10 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · hcaurdb

Parties

Date of order

10 Aug 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In M/S Dhavalamrut Milk Traders v. Income Tax Officer,Ward 2(2), Jalgaon, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

(1) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9978 OF 2018 ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.32 OF 2018 WITHCIVIL APPLICATION NO.9981 OF 2018ININCOME TAX APPEAL NO.33 OF 2018 M/s Dhavalamrut Milk Traders,Through its Partner,Mr. Sanjay Madhukar Sonar,Age: 53 years, Occu: Business,R/o. Hirapur Road, Dudhsagar Marg,Chalisgaon, Dist. Jalgaon-424101 ..APPLICANT VERSUS Income Tax Officer,Ward 2(2), Jalgaon..RESPONDENT Mr R. R. Chandak, Advocate for applicant CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & S. M. GAVHANE,JJ. DATE : 10th AUGUST, 2018 ORAL ORDER : Heard Mr Chandak, learned Counsel appearing for applicant. (2) 9978.18ca etc 2.For the reasons stated in the applications, the applications are allowed and disposed of. 3.The applicant is permitted to amend theappeals. Necessary amendment be carried out withintwo weeks from today. 4.Post the appeals for further considerationon 24[th] August, 2018. (S. M. GAVHANE)JUDGE (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE Tupe

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.