Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Dhodha House v. Commissioner Of Inc...

M/S. Dhodha House v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar And Another

High Court 05 Feb 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S. Dhodha House v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar And Another
Date of order
05 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
1989-90
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Dhodha House v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jalandhar And Another, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Commissioner _of Income_ TaJalandhar & Another ITA-119-2001 (O&M) 3,Consequently, the present petition stands dismissed in the Same terms as in.ITA No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

ITA-119-2001 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA-119-2001 (O&M)Date of Decision : 5.2.2020 M/s. Dhodha House .-- Appellant Versus Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar and another owes RESPONGEnts CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JIUSTICE AJAY TEWAR*HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN777 Present :Mr. Alok Mittal, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Vivek Sethi, Sr. Standing counsel withMr. Varun Issar, Jr. Standing counselfor the respondents, 777 AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)1]This appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act’) against the order passed by the IncomeTax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar Bench, Amritsar passed in Income TaxAppeal No. 71 (ASR)/1994 relating to A.Y. 1989-90, 2 Learned counsel for the appellant is not in a position to denythe fact that the facts of the case are covered by the decision of this Courtpassed in.ITA No. 50,PO0Odecided on 28.72.2014 titled asM/s DhodhaHouse, Kotakpura vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, Jalandhar _Anotherand |ITA No. 118 of 2001decided on 19.12.2014 titled as .M/sDhodha_ House, Kotakpura_vs. Commissioner _of Income_ TaJalandhar & Another ITA-119-2001 (O&M) 3,Consequently, the present petition stands dismissed in the Same terms as in.ITA No. 50-2000 and 4Since the main case has been decided, the pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. 52.2020anuradha (AJAY TEWARTD)JUDGE (AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned4Yes/NoWhether reportable4Yes/No
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan