M/S. Elite Enterprises v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
High Court
16 Jan 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
M/S. Elite Enterprises v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr
Date of order
16 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Elite Enterprises v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Hence, thewrit petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
DATED THIS THE 16[th]DAY OF JANUARY 2018.
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
)WRIT PETITION No.25863/2014 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. ELITE ENTERPRISESSUDHA NILAYA, 7/96NKBAR JUNIOR COLLEGEBELITHANGADY-574 214RBEPRBSEBENTBD BY ITS PARTNSRI. K.B. RAGHURAMANAGED ABOUT 44 YBARS|SON OF SRI. K.G. BALAKRISHNAN.
... PRETITIONBR
(By Mr. BALRAM R. RAO, ADV..,)
AND:
1.|THE COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME -TAXMANGALORE, I FLOOR, CR BUILDING
M.G.ROAD, ATTAVARAMANGALORE-57/5 OOL1MANGALORE-57/5 OOL1
«|THE INCOME TAX OFFICKBRWARD 1, PUTTURWARD 1, PUTTUR
RADHIKA PLAZA, COURT ROADPUTTUR, DAKSHINA KANNADA.PUTTUR, DAKSHINA KANNADA.
... RESPONDENTS
(By Mr. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV., FORMr. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV..,)Mr. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV..,)
THIS W.P. IS KILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 ®& 227 OF THE|CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OFTHE RESPONDENT DT.21.3.14, PASSED U/S.2604 OF THE ACTFOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 VIDE ANN-F & ETC.,,
2/2
THIS W.P. COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY,|THERE COURT MADB THR FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Mr. Balram R. Rao,Adv. tor Petitioner
Mr. E.I. Sanmathi,Adv. for|Mr. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, Adv. Respondents
1.|Thelearnedcounsel forthepetitioner
Mr.Balram R.Rao wants to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Opposite counsel has no objection. Hence, thewrit petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Srl.
od/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue