M/S Essjay Ericsson Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, New Delhi & Ors
High Court
07 Feb 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
M/S Essjay Ericsson Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, New Delhi & Ors
Date of order
07 Feb 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S Essjay Ericsson Private Limited v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, New Delhi & Ors, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~25.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 1449/2020
M/S ESSJAY ERICSSON PRIVATE LIMITED,
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Puneet Aggarwal, Mr. Yuvraj Singh, Ms. Hemlata Rawat and Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advs.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NEW DELHI & ORS.
..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Mr. Talha AR, Mr.Dinesh Sharma and Mr. Siddharth Gupta, Advs.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R
07.02.2020
C.M. No. 5013/2020
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 1449/2020 and C.M. No. 5012/2020
Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. We have heard learned counsels and proceed to dispose of the petition at this stage itself. No counter-affidavit is called for in view of the order that we propose to pass.
The grievance of the petitioner is with regard to the rejection of the petitioner’s application under Section 220(6) by the Assessing Officer vide order dated 23.01.2020 and the consequent attachment of the bank accounts of the petitioner. We are informed that the petitioner’s appeal is already pending before the CIT (Appeals).
We permit the petitioner to immediately file the stay application before the CIT (Appeals). The CIT (Appeals) shall consider the same and pass an order thereon within two weeks without being influenced by the order dated 23.01.2020 passed by the Assessing Officer on the stay application under Section 220(6). The bank accounts of the petitioner already stand attached and the amounts recovered. In case, the CIT (Appeals) grants relief after hearing the assessee, to the extent that any amount may have been recovered in excess of the amount in respect of which stay is not granted, the same shall be restituted to the petitioner by the respondent.
It goes without saying that CIT (Appeals) shall pass a reasoned order on the stay application filed by the assesse.
The petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms.
Order dasti under the signatures of the Court Master.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
FEBRUARY 07, 2020 N.Khanna
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.