M/S. Flipkart Internet Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
High Court
21 Nov 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
M/S. Flipkart Internet Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors
Date of order
21 Nov 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In M/S. Flipkart Internet Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Ors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
DATED THIS THE 21[st]DAY OF NOVEMBER 2016)
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
WRIT PETITION Nos.46423&426/2016 (T&IT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. FLIPKART INTERNET PRIVATE LIMITEDVAISHNAVI SUMMIT, GROUND FLOOR.v[‘T]MAIN, 80 FEET ROAD, 3) BLOC KKORAMANGALA INDUSTRIAL AREA|BANGALORE-5S60034THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY|Mr. R. RAMA CHANDRBA.
_ PRTITIONBR
(BY SRI. PRADEEP NAYAK, ADV., FORM/S. KEYSTONE PARTNERS)
AND:
1.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF [INCOME TAXCIRCLE 3(1)(1), SECOND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|KORAMANGLA, BANGALORE-5S60095.CIRCLE 3(1)(1), SECOND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|KORAMANGLA, BANGALORE-5S60095.
2.THE JOINT COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 3(1)(1), SECOND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|KORAMANGLA, BANGALORE-5S60095.CIRCLE 3(1)(1), SECOND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING|KORAMANGLA, BANGALORE-5S60095.
3.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAX-3|CIRLCES(1)(1), FIFTH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDINGKORAMANGLA, BANGALORE-5S60095.CIRLCES(1)(1), FIFTH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDINGKORAMANGLA, BANGALORE-5S60095.
4THERE CHIBFKF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAC.R. BUILDING No.1, QUEENS ROADBANGALORE -560001.C.R. BUILDING No.1, QUEENS ROADBANGALORE -560001.
Date of Order 21.11.2016 W.P.Nos.46423-426/2016
M/s. Flipkart Internet Private Limited Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
2/3
5.CHNTRAL BOARD OF DIRBCT TAXES|THROUGH THR SKHCRBTARYDEPARIMENT OF REVENUEMINISTRY OF FINANCE.GOVERNMENT OF INDIA.CRHNTRAL SECRETARIATNORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001.
~ RBSPONDENTS
(BY SRI. DILIP, FOR SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.)
THESE W.Ps. ARK FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF|THR CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DBCLARB THE!IMPUGNED INSTRUCTION No.1/20195 (F.No.225/319/2014-ITA.II)DATEBED 13.1.2015 ISSUBD BY R-5 AT ANNEBX-A AS NULL AVOID AND HOLD I[T TO BEB CONTRARY TO THR PROVISIONS OTHE ACT AND/OR CALL FOR, EXAMINE THE RECORDS IN.RELATION TO AND QUASH THE IMPUGNED INSTRUCTION|No.1/2015(F.No.225/319/2014-ITA.II)DATED13.11.9015ISSUBD BY R-5 AT ANNBX-A AS BBING [ILLEGAL ANDARBITRARY.
THERESE W.Ps. COMING ON FOR FINAL DISPOSAL THIDAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Mr.Pradeep Nayak, Adv. forM/s. Keystone Partners
Adv. for Petitioner
Mr. Dilip, Adv. forWirK.V. Aravind, Adv. for Respondents
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitsthat since the refund due to the petitioner-assessee hasbeen granted by the Income Tax Department, hetherefore, does not want to press this writ petition onmerits.
Date of Order 21.11.2016 W.P.Nos.46423-426/2016
M/s. Flipkart Internet Private Limited Vs.
The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors.
3/3
2. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as
not pressed.
Srl.
od/-|
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.