M/S Friends Alloys H v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh
High Court
17 Jan 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Friends Alloys H v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh
Date of order
17 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Friends Alloys H v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Chandigarh, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: 4In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of on the sameterms and conditions of the above referred judgment.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
204
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA.AT CHANDIGARH
ITA-233-2018(0&M)Date of decision : 17.01.2020
M/S FRIENDS ALLOYS H.NO.2906/1 SEC 37-C CHD|
APPELLANT
VERSUS
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHANDIGARH
RESPONDENTS
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICEK AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR.JIUSTICEK AVNEESH JHING
555
Present :Mr. Munish Kapila, Advocate and
Mr. Aman Parti, Advocate
for the appellant,
Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocatefor the respondent.
555
AJAY TEWARI, J. (Oral)
1The present appeal has been filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 [for short 'the Act'], against the order dated 07.02.2017 passed bythe Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Division Bench, Chandigarh in ITANo.1251/CHD/2016 for the assessment year 2012-13,
?DLearned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved inthe present appeal is covered by the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court inPr. Commissioner ofIncome Tax, Shimla Versus M/s Aarham Softronics; 2019
(2) TMI, 1285
3Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the above factual
submission.
4In view of the above, the present appeal is disposed of on the sameterms and conditions of the above referred judgment.
(AJAY TEWARI )JUDGE
17[th|]January, 2020
shabha
Whether speaking/reasonedWhether Reportable :
(AVNEESH JHINGAN)JUDGE)Yes/NoYes/No
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue