Case Law › High Court › Ms Ganeshkumar Jayeshkumar And Co v. Ree...

Ms Ganeshkumar Jayeshkumar And Co v. Reema Hota Singh Principal Commissioner Of

High Court 02 Apr 2024 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

02 Apr 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Ms Ganeshkumar Jayeshkumar And Co v. Reema Hota Singh Principal Commissioner Of, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as havingbeen satisfied.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

$~15 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +CONT.CAS(C) 36/2024 MS GANESHKUMAR JAYESHKUMAR AND CO..... PetitionerThrough:Mr. Paritosh Jain, Mr. Vidhan Jain,Advocates (M: ) versus REEMA HOTA SINGH PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 10 ..... RespondentThrough:Mr. Abhishek Maratha, Sr. StandingCounsel with Ms. Nupur Sharma, Mr.Parth Semwal, Advocates along withMr. Ravinder Kr. Yadav, Addl. CIT(M: ) CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R%02.04.2024 1.Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions towithdraw the present petition, as the judgment dated 25[th]January, 2022passed in W.P.(C) 7907/2021, already stands complied with. 2.The aforesaid fact is reiterated by the learned counsel for respondent. 3.Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, as havingbeen satisfied. APRIL 2, 2024 au MINI PUSHKARNA, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.