Case Law › High Court › M/S. Gautam Steel v. The Commissioner Of...

M/S. Gautam Steel v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 18 Feb 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

18 Feb 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Gautam Steel v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2591 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2591 OF 2007 WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2591 OF 2007 M/s. Gautam Steel ... Petitioner Versus The Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors. ... Respondents Mr. P.P. Prabhu with Mr. P.G. Pandit for the Petitioner. Mr.Vimal Gupta with Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the Respondents. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&R.S. MOHITE, JJ.DATED: FEBRUARY 18, 2008 CORAM: F.I. R.S. MOHITE, JJ. DATED: FEBRUARY 18, 2008 P.C. P.C. . Having the learned counsel and for the reasons given, we find that this is not a fit case to exercise our extra ordinary jurisdiction. Whatever contentions the Petitioner may have, the same can be raised before the Assessin Officer. . With the above observations, Petition disposed of. (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.) (R.S. MOHITE, J.) (F.I.REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.