M/S. Grace Construction v. Appropriate Authority & Ors
High Court
24 Nov 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
M/S. Grace Construction v. Appropriate Authority & Ors
Date of order
24 Nov 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In M/S. Grace Construction v. Appropriate Authority & Ors, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1 202 caw140.10
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTIONCIVIL APPLICATION NO.1175 OF 2009WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1158 OF 2009
M/s. Grace Construction
.. Petitioner.
Vs.
1. Appropriate Authority & Ors.
.. Respondents.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.140 OF 2010
Mr. Suhas Narayan Deshpande
Vs.
1. Appropriate Authority & Ors.
.. Applicant.
.. Respondents.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.694 OF 2010
M/s.Vyankatesh Warehousing and
Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. .. Applicant.
Vs.
1. Appropriate Authority & Ors.
.. Respondents.
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1852 OF 2010
Ramesh Shankarlal Bhandri .. Applicant.
Vs.
1. Appropriate Authority & Ors... Respondents.
Mr.D.S. Mhaispurkar for the Petitioner and for the applicant in CA No.1175/2009 and 1158/2010.Mr.Sachin Gite for the applicant in CA No.694/2010.Mr. Sham Walve for the Respondents.
P.C.
CORAM : A.S. OKA & A.K. MENON, JJ.DATED : 24TH NOVEMBER, 2017
1.The writ petition has been dismissed by a separate judgment and order, therefore, these civil applications will not survive. However, no adjudication is made on the issue of title raised by the third party intervenors.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(A.S. OKA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.