M/S Great Value Foods v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Amritsar
High Court
01 Apr 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Great Value Foods v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Amritsar
Date of order
01 Apr 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In M/S Great Value Foods v. Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, Amritsar, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 19432 of 2013Decided on : 01.04.2014
M/s Great Value Foods
Versus
Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Amritsar
. . . Petitioner
. . . Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASPAL SINGH
PRESENT: Mr. Salil Kapoor, Advocate,
Mr. Vikas Jain, Advocate,
Mr. Rishabh Kapoor, Advocate and
Mr. Saurabh Kapoor, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Denesh Goyal, Advocate for the respondent.
****
AJAY KUMAR MITTAL, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has produced a communication dated 26.03.2014, addressed to the Principal Officer of the petitioner company, received from the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-4, New Delhi, intimating that the approval for transferring the case to the jurisdiction of the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle-V, Amritsar (Punjab) has been received and the seized material belonging to the assessee is being handed over to the Assessing Officer for further necessary action as per the mandate of Section 153C of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The communication is taken on record.
2.Learned counsel for the respondent does not dispute the aforesaid fact.
3.Learned counsel for the parties state that the writ petition has become infructuous and may be disposed of as such.4.Ordered accordingly.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL) JUDGE
April 01, 2014
(JASPAL SINGH) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.