Case Law › High Court › M/S Greater Ludhiana Areadevelopment Aut...

M/S Greater Ludhiana Areadevelopment Authority, Ludhiana v. Cwp40112014Date Of Decision: 05.11.2014

High Court 05 Nov 2014 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · phhc

Parties

Date of order

05 Nov 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Greater Ludhiana Areadevelopment Authority, Ludhiana v. Cwp40112014Date Of Decision: 05.11.2014, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Decision: In view of statement made by counsel for the petitioner,the present petition is disposed of as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M/s Greater Ludhiana AreaDevelopment Authority, Ludhiana VERSUS CWP40112014Date of decision: 05.11.2014 eee Petitioner Assistant Commissioner ot IncomeTax, Ludhiana .... Respondent CORAMHON5BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJTVE BHALLAHON5BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL Present#Mr.Ravi Shankar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rajesh Katoch, Advocate, for the respondent. KOK oK RAJIVE BHALLA, J. (ORAL) Counsel for the petitioner submits that as the appeal hasbeen decided by the Commissioner of Income Tax Appeals,Ludhiana, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and maybe disposed of accordingly and interim order dated 04.03.2014 maybe ordered to continue for three weeks as the petitioner has filed anappeal alongwith an application for stay but the Income TaxAppellate Tribunal is not sitting in this week. In view of statement made by counsel for the petitioner,the present petition is disposed of as infructuous. Interim order dated04.03.2014 shall remain in force for three weeks. | RAJIVE BHALLA |JUDGE 05.11.2014Shamsher S.Sabharwal |} AMIT RAWAL JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.