Case Law › High Court › M/S Gutte Infra Private Limited, Bandra...

M/S Gutte Infra Private Limited, Bandra v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nagpur – 440 001 And Others

High Court 09 Dec 2016 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · testcase

Parties

Date of order

09 Dec 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S Gutte Infra Private Limited, Bandra v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Nagpur – 440 001 And Others, the High Court (2016) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION W. NO.2642/2016IN WRIT PETITION NO.5098/2016 M/s Gutte Infra Private Limited, Bandra through its Director/AuthorisedSignatory and others...Versus... Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Nagpur – 440 001 and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's ordersappearances, Court's orders of directionsand Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri S.V. Bhutada, Advocate for petitioners Shri Bhushan Mohta, Advocate for respondents CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND MRS. SWAPNA JOSHI, JJ.DATE: 09.12.2016 The amendment application is allowed. Theamendment should be carried out within one week. The civil application stands disposed of. Stand over in the second week of January, 2017. JUDGEJUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.