Case LawHigh Court › M/S Haryana State Small Industries & Exp...

M/S Haryana State Small Industries & Export Corpn. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula

High Court 10 Jul 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
M/S Haryana State Small Industries & Export Corpn. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula
Date of order
10 Jul 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M/S Haryana State Small Industries & Export Corpn. Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Panchkula, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of the statement made by counsel for theappellant, the appeal is dismissed in terms of order dated1.8.2012, passed in ITA No.79 of 2012. [ Rajive Bhalla ] Judge July 10, 2013. kadyan [Dr.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH ITA No.90 of 2013 (O&M)Date of decision: July 10, 2013. M/s Haryana State Small Industries & Export Corpn. Ltd. ... Appellant v. Commissioner of Income Tax, Panchkula ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present:Ms. Radhika Suri, Advocate, for the appellant. Rajive Bhalla, J. (Oral): Counsel for the appellant fairly states that the questionof law framed in the appeal has already been answered againstthe appellant in ITA No.79 of 2012, M/s Haryana State SmallIndustries & Export Corpn. Ltd. v. CIT, Panchkula, decided on1.8.2012. In view of the statement made by counsel for theappellant, the appeal is dismissed in terms of order dated1.8.2012, passed in ITA No.79 of 2012. [ Rajive Bhalla ] Judge July 10, 2013. kadyan [Dr. Bharat Bhushan Parsoon] Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan