Case LawHigh Court › M/S. Herbicides India Limited v. The Ass...

M/S. Herbicides India Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3, Jaipur

High Court 24 Oct 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
M/S. Herbicides India Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3, Jaipur
Date of order
24 Oct 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In M/S. Herbicides India Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 3, Jaipur, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the review petition is not entertained, the same stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH ATJAIPUR D.B. Civil Review No. 44 / 2017 M/s. Herbicides India Limited, Having Its Registered Office At Plot No. 12, Industrial Area, Jhotwara, Jaipur Through Its Authorized Signatory- Mr. Ashok Kumar Dugar ----Petitioner Versus The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 3, Jaipur ----Respondent _____________________________________________________ For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anant Kasliwal with Ms. Charu PareekFor Respondent(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi with Mr. Aditya Vijay _____________________________________________________ HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.S. JHAVERI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR VYASOrder 24/10/2017 Defects are cured during the course of the day. By way of this review petition, the petitioner has sought forreview of the order which has been passed by us on 26.4.2017. Counsel for the petitioner contended that merely because thepaper book was not supplied, the review petition was dismissed,therefore, the appeal is required to be heard on merits. In our considered opinion, both the appeals being identical and once the judgment of the tribunal in one appeal (817/2008)stands confirmed between the same parties even if it is ontechnical ground, therefore, the same is required to be followed inthe next assessment year also. In that view of the matter, the contention raised by petitioner is required to be rejected. Hence, the review petition is not entertained, the same stands dismissed. (VIJAY KUMAR VYAS)J. (K.S. JHAVERI)J. Anil Sharma43.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan