In M/S Hewlett Packard India Ltd. Through: None v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI10.
+ ITA 232/2003
M/S HEWLETT PACKARD INDIA LTD. Through: None
..... Appellant
versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Dileep Shivpuri, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Advocate.
CORAM:
JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R% 20.01.2016
1. The notice sent to the Appellant/Assessee has been returned unserved
with the remarks ‘does not exist at the given address’. The Assessee has
obviously not kept the Registry informed of the change of address.
2. None is also appearing for the Appellant.
3. Dismissed for non-prosecution.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
JANUARY 20, 2016/mg
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue